Abstract
The present work analyzes the colonial linguistic imagination problems and the relationship with the obstruction of the contingent nature of its own language. The colonial linguistic is the result of an existential impoverishment process complex and castration of the consciousness throw the language. It can be read with the articulation of diversity of epistemological framework that must be carefully deciphered. The linguistic colonial is nothing else than negation of the word and therefore the negation itself of the other. Indeed, the languages and their discursive meta-regimes as we know are nothing more than, complex forms of overlapping of the imperial/ colonial power, that is to say simple inventions that were unable of documenting the immensity of attributes that define the own nature of the non-euro American language.
References
Chow. R. (2006). The Age of the World Target. New York: Duke University Press
Deumert, A. & Storch, A. (Edit.). Colonial and Decolonial Linguistics. (pp.289-300). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship.
Fabián, J. (1986). Language and power colonial. Los Ángeles: University of California Press.
Makoni, S. (2022). Interview. Pour une nouvelle ontologie du langage. Entrevista realizada por CANNUT, Cécile. y GUELLOUZ, Mariem. Semen, 50 (2).
Mufwene, S. (2021). “Decolonial linguistics as paradigm shift: Acommentary”; en: Deumert, A. & Storch, A. (Edit.). Colonial and Decolonial Linguistics. (pp.289-300). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship.
McGroarty, M. (2008). “The Political Matrix of Linguistic Ideologies”, en: Spolsky, B & Hult, F. (Edits). The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. (pp.98-136). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Ocampo, A. (2020). En torno al verbo incluir: performatividades heurísticas de la educación inclusiva. Revista Quaestiones Disputatae: Temas en Debate, 27(13), 18-54.
Pennycook, A. & Makoni, S. (2019). Innovations and Challenges in Applied Linguistics from the Global South. London: Routledge.
Quijano, A. (1989). Colonialidad y modernidad/racionalidad. Perú indígena, 29, 11-20.
Sousa, B. (2020). The end of the cognitive empire: the coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press.
Spivak, G. (1998). ¿Puede hablar el subalterno? Recuperado el 10 de marzo de 2023 de: https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.2732/pr.2732.pdf
Spivak, G. (2013). An Aesthetic education in the era of Globalization. New York: University Columbia Press.
Veronelli, G. (2015). The coloniality of language: race, expressivity, power, and the darker side of modernity. Recuperado el 03 de marzo de 2023 de: http://sites.cortland.edu/wagadu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/07/5-FIVE-Veronelli.pdf
Zimmermann, K. (2022). The Colonial Impact on the Linguistics of Native American Languages. Recuperado el 28 de febrero de 2023 de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364317449_EL_IMPACTO_COLONIAL_EN_LA_LINGUISTICA_DE_LAS_LENGUAS_INDIGENAS_DE_AMERICA_The_Colonial_Impact_on_the_Linguistics_of_Native_American_Languages
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Aldo Ocampo González